Sunday, September 8, 2013

The biggest problem with tomorrow's consoles

No pepperoni and cheese—that’s the biggest problem with the next generation of consoles from Sony and Microsoft.

Sublime graphics and rich internet personas might find the PS4 and Xbox One snatched from store shelves, but there’s an age-old feature missing, one that reaches back to their ancestral origins.

Split-Screen Gaming. 
                                                  
Sony and Microsoft have tried to bridge the divide with network gameplay, but a camera and sound system—no matter how sophisticated or powerful—is no match for the lingo of body language.

Some of my fondest childhood memories involve staying home with a group of friends and playing an outdated version of Gran Turismo on the original PlayStation. We made a day out of it, racing each other until the buttons were imprinted on our fingers. Parents didn’t mind because the laughter and enthusiasm of children would fill the halls, and those are their favourite sounds in the whole world.
The only problem is there are few games that support split-screen functionality. Need for Speed and Medal of Honor—two of the biggest gaming franchises—no longer support a ‘Player 2’ mode. There is no 007 GoldenEye for today’s generation and each game developer cites screen real-estate as the reason why.

But that’s no longer a problem. New technology from TV companies now make it possible for two players to watch their own game action on one full screen. They simply put on a pair of special glasses and they can verse their friend-turn-foe without having to sacrifice any screen space.

And they can do this sitting right next to each other. The good old way.

Sony introduced the technology with their PlayStation television, but the real kudos goes to LG for integrating the tech into ordinary TVs.


Thanks to this stroke of technological brilliance gaming can be social again. Friends can gather around a television and chant as though they’re at the Colosseum and two gladiators are about to give it their all. There will be trash-talk and laughter and hysterics. Memories will be born.

The winner will gloat and the loser will endure ridicule until a rematch takes place. But until then they will break bread. 

And if there's no bread they can always settle for a pepperoni and cheese pizza.


Friday, July 19, 2013

Ashton Kutcher is the man to play Steve Jobs: 5 reasons why

Steve Jobs, the man who made electronics cool and reformed several industries along the way, has left an incredible legacy. Following his death two movie studios have been aggressively working on biopics, of which the first is to be released next month (August). Surely for a character as prolific as Jobs, you’d expect three time Oscar winner Daniel Day Lewis to don the black skivvy, or someone with the gravitas thereof.
But they picked Ashton Kutcher, of the pot-centric That 70s Show. It's forgivable to reject the notion Kutcher could deliver any justice to Jobs, but in the wake of the latest Jobs trailer, we've compiled a few reasons why we believe he might be able to pull the feat off.

1. Kutcher is active in many industries, including the technology sector. Jobs just didn’t make computers, he changed industries. By biographer Walter Isaacson’s count, Jobs “revolutionised six industries: personal computer, animated movies, music, phones, tablet computing, and digital publishing.”
Ashton Kutcher has his hands in almost as many industries. He started off as a model, found fame as an actor and has produced several television shows, most notably Beauty and a Geek USA and Punk’d

Beyond his Hollywood exploits, he has invested in several tech companies, such as Skype and 4Square. Additionally he was the first user on Twitter to amass more than a million followers; an indication he recognises the power technology plays in everyday communication.

Also on Kutcher’s resume is a co-founder credit for starting up the human rights organisation “THORN: Digital Defenders of Children.” The organisation focuses on the role technology plays in exploitation crimes, such as paedophilic sex.

2.  A 35 year old Ashton Kutcher looks a lot like Steve Jobs. Perhaps it is most evident in this photo of Ashton juxtaposed alongside one of Jobs. 
You may be thinking "Yeah, but he'd look nothing like an old Steve Jobs." Well think again. 
3.  Ashton actually understands the enigma that is Steve Jobs. Most people would consider a tech Titan like Jobs to be a man of science alone, but that’s far from the truth. Jobs took psychedelic drugs, was largely spiritual and often turned to music as a form of expression. In fact, Jobs considered himself a man of the humanities before a man of the sciences:

“I always thought of myself as a humanities person as a kid, but I liked electronics,” Jobs said in an interview with biographer Isaacson.

“Then I read something that one of my heroes, Edwin Land of Polaroid, said about the importance of people who could stand at the intersection of humanities and sciences, and I decided that’s what I wanted to do.”
If an actor fails to recognise how Jobs harmonised the Arts and the Sciences, then they would’ve failed to capture the core of his essence. Fortunately Kutcher is an artist drawn to technology. It doesn’t feel like he needs to fabricate this harmony as much as bring it to the surface.

Kutcher took to Quora to explain his motivations for wanting to portray Jobs. In his post, he says:

“It was a perfect convergence in my craft and my interests. I've spent the last 5 years working with early stage technology companies as an investor and advisor. Whenever you take on a role, it's like a crash course in the subject matter of the film. So while researching the role I was able to spend countless hours studying tech design, product, and history.

“It also afforded me the opportunity to meet with several of Steve's peers who happen to be icons of the tech world.

4.  Not only does Ashton understand Jobs, but he respects him and his legacy. The first reason Ashton lists in his Quora post is:

“I care. As I read the script I had a knot in my stomach. I imagined actors playing the role and not connecting to the love that went into some of the seemingly irrational decisions that Steve sometimes made. If this film becomes an enduring memory, of a man I admire, I wanted to ensure that it was portrayed by someone who cared about his legacy and took the time to represent him in a way that people who were close to Steve felt to be authentic.”
5. Even if he ends up in hospital, Kutcher is prepared to do Jobs justice. Recently Kutcher revealed he adopted Jobs' fruitarian diet only to end up in hospital two days before shooting began. 

"First of all, the fruitarian diet can lead to, like, some severe issues," Kutcher told Mashable at the Sundance Film Festival. "I ended up in the hospital like two days before we started shooting the movie. I was, like, doubled over in pain.”

"My pancreas levels were completely out of whack, which was really terrifying ... considering everything."

Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer in 2011.

As it stands Kutcher is playing the underdog card. Let’s hope he uses the element of surprise to his advantage and captivates audiences in the same way Jobs commanded the attention of people all over the world. Jobs will be released on August 29th, 2013 in Australia.

By Tony Ibrahim

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Farewell Roger Ebert, my hero

I fear younger generations won’t know who Roger Ebert is. In brief, Roger Ebert was one of the most prolific film critics of all time. Not only was he the first film critic to win a Pulitzer Prize, he is also the only film critic to grace the Hollywood Walk of Fame with his very own star.


A lot of Ebert’s charisma came from his pure love of cinema. It was never about money or office politics. For him, there was an underlying truth to each film that deserved to be shared. His job was to expose it, no more and no less.

Unfortunately his career is lined with a sad poetry. In 2006, after beating thyroid cancer and a growth on his salivary glands, doctors discovered a cancerous growth in Ebert’s mouth. To operate on the tumour surgeons had to remove a portion of his lower jaw. Complications in surgery caused Ebert, the man who reached audiences through television and radio, to lose his voice.

But he persevered. The advent of the internet helped Ebert reach an even wider audience and he spoke to them about a variety of topics. He was, by my assessment, incredibly intelligent and enlightened. He never preached an agenda; rather, he sought debate on the topics that matter. His essay I do not fear death remains forever etched on my mind as one of the most harrowingly beautiful reads.

In it he describes Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes, and today, on what would’ve been his 71st birthday, I pay this cinephile tribute by echoing its sentiment. He articulates his understanding below:

I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes.


Roger Ebert passed away on April 4th, 2013. Most people will remember him for his love of film, but I’ll remember and continue to revere his relentless pursuit of knowledge.

Farewell my hero.

Tony Ibrahim

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here

Saturday, June 15, 2013

The two types of people

There are two types of people in this world: Apple fanatics and Google loyalists. These are proud and vocal supporters of the latest craze in electronics. In fact, if you’re ever feeling blue just jump online and search any mobile thread. The insults between the two, naturally written in MySpace prose, will make you laugh hard and long.

I myself am a Google man, but up until now, I’ve never known why. It’s not like I had owned an iPhone before. I have an old MacBook and an iPod Shuffle and I love them dearly. So why don’t I like the phone that changed “everything?”

To find out I had to scour back many years, back when I worked for an Australian telco. At the time Apple was launching their first gen iPhone. Customers travelled long and far for a phone that was, more often than not, out of stock. The lucky few who nabbed one acted as if they found the Golden ticket to Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory.


They modelled their phone and boasted its feature set. But back then, it couldn’t even send a picture message. Worse yet, a young iTunes governed its functions like an African dictator.

When you asked an Apple enthusiast why they liked the iPhone, they struggled to form sentences. Eventually they’d surmise “because it’s an Apple product.”

It didn’t matter its rivals had a better camera, offered free GPS and Bluetooth connectivity. Apple made it and they piss gold.

Apple’s phenomenon grew to unprecedented proportions. Newer, better iPhones hit the market and people camped outside their stores, praying there’d be enough stock. Come sunrise, the rowdy line—which enveloped blocks—would almost always spark a fight. In China they closed an Apple store for such a reason.


Then there’s the ridiculous lengths poor telco staff have to go through each time one of them is sold. “I’ll activate your phone for you. You want to transfer your contacts from a Samsung you say? Do you use iTunes yet? Well forget it, now you will, for everything!”

It doesn’t end once that’s over because the ongoing support is a bitch. “The screen is cracked you say? You bought it five minutes ago? Well Apple will have to swap it for a brand new one. Two weeks please.”

A career as a journalist has seen my relationship with Apple change. The other day I picked one up and I played with it for hours as I tried to shift my life onto it. The software is svelte. The design is, frankly, quite impressive. I could even appreciate Apple’s closed ecosystem.

So why did I ever hate the iPhone?

Because it brought the worst out of people. Owning an iPhone imparted a false sense of superiority on those who paid the extortionate prices. And that, that is why I put down the iPhone.



Fortunately the impending Samsung assault is seeing the badge tarnished and the resolve of fanatics weaken.

But now iOS 7 is coming out, which essentially is a theme for the software, and the fanboys are shining their teeth as they vie for another bite of the Apple. 

By Tony Ibrahim 

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here

Saturday, May 11, 2013

My Church Has Blood, Sweat and Tears


I’m not a classically religious man. I don’t attend church and I’m in constant flux when it comes to my religion’s dogma. But a man without a church is a man wandering blind, and so I’ve found my own place of religious piety and self-examination.

My sacred place is open every hour of every day, it is five minutes from my place and it welcomes everyone.

It’s the local gym.
It too has an altar, and a musk in the air that appeases the senses when it’s time to exercise discipline. There’s a Eucharist of sorts brimmed with a liquid that nourishes the muscles and the uniformity of a choir playing metallic instruments. Some even have their own preachers reciting scripture from well-known authorities. Every person that attends believes they can be better by achieving one goal at a time. Achieving their goals is heavenly, but falling shy carries with it a hellish after-taste that lingers well beyond training hours.

I don’t believe the gym is a substitute for religious enlightenment or spirituality—that would be dense. Rather after a hard day’s work in a world riddled by constant injustices and a pervading sense Karma is procrastinating, I find comfort in knowing the mysteries of the universe can be eluded by a single repetitive and predictable motion.

For instance: if I extend and retract my arm carrying weights, the muscle will improve. By focusing solely on how heavy and how many times I do this, I can control my body, and that’s probably the most control I can exercise over my life’s wealth, romance and general well-being.

I dare explore what happens when you injure yourself at the gym—often a common occurrence—but I’m handicapped by my own trauma. I can say there’s a great reward in overcoming an injury.

Having such a wonderful haven from everyday reality is priceless. I process my frustrations—anger, doubts, sexual—in a way that is healthy and almost always makes me feel better. Unfortunately there’s an alarming group of people breaking some of the gym’s cardinal rules. These are as sacred as commandments and should be followed just as stringently. They are:

       I shall not Facebook at the gym
       I shall not use performance enhancing drugs
       I shall not douse my face in makeup
       I shall not leer at fellow gym patrons
       I shall not judge the weak
       I shall offer fellow patrons a spot
       I shall return my weights
       I shall use a towel
       I shall diet
       I shall push myself to my absolute limits

We do so many things for so many other people and institutions; the gym is magical because it’s the one place we do things for ourselves. So remember to do it right, to concentrate on what you’re doing—why you’re doing it—and not the pretty blond with the clown make up. Throw on the weight and focus only on the one thing that matters: you can do it.

Then do it again.  

By Tony Ibrahim

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here

Saturday, April 6, 2013

How to turn a pussy into a Superman


Every time I walk out of a Superman movie I’m struck by the same question: Why is Superman such a pussy? Brimmed with super-powers every child covets, walking out of a Superman movie should be a matter of dodging dropped jaws.

I’m aware more jaws were dropped in the days of Christopher Reeve, but over time modern storytellers failed to make this caped crusader Super.


Super-Pussy

Take the most recent Superman flick, Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns. The titular character navigates a plane disintegrating in mid-air to prevent it from crashing into a packed baseball stadium. The scene itself is a visual spectacle and one of the rare occasions where the audience feels Superman’s alien powers will fail him. In fact, even though it is half way through, it is the film’s climactic scene.


Unfortunately this badass display of heroics is undermined by Superman’s Ned Flanders bravado as the first thing he says after the feat is:

Is everybody alright? I hope this doesn’t turn you off flying. Statistically speaking, it’s still the safest way to travel.

Really? Do you work for the RTA (DMV) or something? Was that paid advertising? I’d rather he say nothing at all and fly away. The sound of thunderous applause falling deaf on his superhuman ears as seeing his one love—the one person who knows Superman isn’t always Super—shakes him.

Singer’s Superman, with his friend-zone persona, is castrated. Why would any girl want to throw down a Ken Doll? And as for little kids, they’re more likely to don the Dark Knight’s cape than red undies. I for one certainly do.

The Crux

Most superheroes are emotionally crippled from a childhood trauma. Batman, Robin and Spiderman’s parents are dead, while the Hulk and Wolverine killed theirs. When you really sit down and think about it, Superheroes aren’t mentally sound but we love them nonetheless because unlike us, they don’t succumb to injustice. Their masked faces could be anyone—even you—and when they stand up for the little guy a piece of the audience does too.


Most people don’t know what Superman’s trauma is because his backstory is often malnourished. Superman’s mother and father didn’t just die: his entire planet did. Moments before Krypton was destroyed, his father, Jor El, placed him in a space craft and punched in the coordinates for Earth. He is the last of his kind.

We might revel in the CGI effects afforded by his superpowers, but for Superman, they’re a reminder of his solidarity. No human could relate to his desolation, especially when he’s all dandy. A helpless Superman, one who can’t change something in spite of his laser powers, is one the audience could relate to.

Don’t misconstrue my plea to humanise Superman. I want him to bleed for some of the film, even most of it. Then I’d like him to overcome it in all his glory.

A healthy dose of Venom

A part of Superman should resent humanity because they take companionship for granted. Couples fight, thieves plunder, murderers slaughter and villains, well villains usher in the apocalypse.

Who does he have? No one.

But I bet if he had another kryptonian companion, he’d take them out for ice cream, check out Disneyland and watch Breaking Bad with them.

“That Walter White!” he’d say with his cheesy grin, perplexed by conundrum of a good guy breaking bad for all the right reasons.

Is it you, God?

In the presence of these parasites and armed with his inimitable skillset, the next dilemma confronting Superman is: Who am I to play God? Superman might have God’s muscle, but it’s his lack of philosophical enlightenment that makes his character so darn juicy.

Every time Superman intervenes, he decides who lives and who dies. Consider what would happen if people died because Superman intervened with someone’s natural death.

Picture this: Some guy is walking in the rain when a clap of thunder strikes a tree. The tree falls and crushes him in what God has decided is his natural end.

Hollywood’s Superman would have him intervene and save him, as his cape parts the heavens and bathes Metropolis in sunlight. But what if this guy Superman saves walks off and pops two bullets into a six year old?

The power to spare a life is inevitably bogged down by philosophical and religious complexity, which would make for grand subtext in a Superman movie.

I’d also like to see a Superman torn by his inability to save someone, when all his speed and ice-cold breath isn’t enough.

After all, “a hero is an ordinary individual who finds the strength to persevere and endure in spite of overwhelming obstacles.” At least that's Christopher Reeves view.

Anchor

So far I have painted Superman to be tormented, discontent and alone. Considering his world destroyed itself, why should he stop humans from doing the same?

Lois Lane, that’s why.

Lois has always been painted as a go-getter journalist with an agenda to find the truth. There’s been an aeon of tension between the two characters who, like Romeo and Juliet, are borne from different worlds. But this Pulitzer Prize winner lacks heroism because she seldom has something to overcome. 
Lois is heroic in overcoming adversity
What if she wasn’t? What if Lois represented all the good let down by an unjust world? If she was a single struggling parent, formerly abused, trying to do right by her child. What if she was the reason why Superman chooses to stand up for the little people, not because he’s in love with her, but because he’s inspired by her inability to give up? Because she is balance, honest and righteous.

Sure, he can kiss her in the sequel.

PMS

Superman’s powers should be linked to his emotional state. 

It’s hard not being angry sometimes. Imagine how much harder it would be when an otherwise ordinary tiff could see a car ripped clean in half? Like the high from heroin, that kind of strength is addictive. In Star Wars it’s The Dark Side and in Spiderman it’s Venom.

On the other end of the spectrum, a Superman riddled with self-doubt should have stunted powers. An impotent Superman would have to tend to his inner conflict before his virility returns.

The Punch Line

A real problem with Superman is his sedated slew of foes, in particularly Lex Luther. Luther comes off as a businessman. His tiff with Superman boils down to a battle of economics; dry the bloke’s resources and call it a day.

There is no greater villain than the Joker. (Okay, a few sit alongside him on the mantle but he’s definitely a distinguished member of the I want to destroy wherever alumni).

Now Ledger’s Joker in The Dark Knight coerced the hairs on the back of my neck to stand stiff. His nervous energy could barely be tamed, so much so that the audience didn’t even know what octave his voice was going to hit. His knife-yielding hand jerked uncontrollably and he licked his lips like a dog readying for the maul.


The Joker was unpredictable. The Joker was chaos. The Joker was fearsome.

Unfortunately for Superman, his nemesis is just as dull as he is. An average Joe doesn’t instil fear and there’s certainly no triumph in taking him down.

Redemption

Due in a couple of months is the latest iteration of Superman. Following in the example set by Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy, it’s simply titled Man Of Steel. Nolan is the executive producer and the extraordinary Zack Snyder, of Watchman and 300 acclaim, will be directing. Our knight in blue spandex is Henry Cavill (Immortals, The Count of Monte Cristo) and for the first time in years, I dare say on the basis of the trailer that I want to don blinding red underwear.



By Tony Ibrahim

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here

Thursday, February 14, 2013

The longest five minutes of my life

It was a Saturday night. I pulled up outside her house ready for our first date. “I’ll be down in five” she said. I didn’t care because the sun was out, the windows were down and the Temper Trap had just begun singing their tale Sweet Disposition.

Sweet disposition
Never too soon
Oh, reckless abandon
Like no one's watching you
A moment of love

I thought to myself: how weird would it be if this girl, this stranger, turns out to be the woman I spend the rest of my life with?

Could she be into comic books (+1), travelling (+3) and find my sense of toilet humour refreshingly funny (+3)?

She’ll be a medical professional (+4), have an eye for art (+2) and a heart for live music (+4). Her hair will be brown (+1) and she’ll be tall, but not so tall that she’ll be taller than me when wearing heels (+3). Her apartment will have contemporary styling (+1) and her dog will be a loyal golden retriever by the name of Wilfred (+3).

We’ll live in an apartment on the beach and swim in the mornings and I’ll cook breakfast and squeeze fresh orange juice. Come winter we’ll spend the cold nights bathed in the glow of a warm fire, comforted by the simplicity of one another's company and only pausing for the occasional sip of wine.

Eventually I’ll learn how to use my hands. How to turn cold slabs of timber into a crib. Perhaps two.  



I’m interrupted by a message. “Just a couple more minutes” it reads. I check my hair and continue singing.

A dream
A laugh
A kiss
A cry
Our rights
Our wrongs

Just a month ago I was on a whole other first date. What if things don’t go right this time?

If my jokes are met by deafening silence? (-4) If she orders a salad and then eyes my steak (-2). If she won’t shut up about her ex (-5). Thinks twilight is critically acclaimed (-3). Slaps me once for saying ‘That’s what she said’ (-2). Is as deep as a bowling pin (-4). Has slept with half the waiters in the restaurant (-5). Girls too (+2).  

A single rogue hair draws my attention.

Is my shirt untucked? What if she doesn’t like my shirt? (-1) Where we’re going (-1). The size of my feet (-2). My disregard of all things Gaga (-3). Thinks I’m a nerd (-3). My thoughts on euthanasia (-3). The way I kiss (-4).

What if she doesn’t want kids (-5)?

Goodbye Wilfred. Farewell crib.

Stay there
'Cause I'll be coming over
While our blood's still young

With the hair in place, I nervously fumble into the cool position. It may have been inspired by the Fonz. I can’t pull it off.

A young boy, no more than 5, spurs past on his green and black BMX. For no apparent reason he slams the brakes and wobbles to a halt. He scurries back with wide eyes until he stops at an ant colony. They’re okay and he smiles.

Suddenly it becomes clear it doesn't matter how many -45 dates I go on because it only takes one—one +25 date—to deem any other unnecessary. Best of all, every fibre of the universe is cheering me on.

The door clicks. Our eyes lock.

 “Hi.”

By Tony Ibrahim

Like Farewell Blank Page on Facebook here